Now that the BMW XM is here, it’s the funkiest looking and most powerful BMW of all time. It also competes with cars that BMW wouldn’t normally compete with, such as the Lamborghini Urus. Typically, fast SUVs like the X5 M are outclassed by the Urus, as they can neither handle, nor accelerate like the big Lambo. However, the BMW XM now makes enough power and has enough style to actually compete with the Lamborghini, just as a budget option.
This test is a bit unfair to both cars for different reasons—the Urus is old now and the XM is significantly cheaper—so it actually sort of evens out. So now that BMW offers an uber-high-end performance SUV, let’s see how it compares to the current ultimate performance SUV.
First, let’s start by saying that neither car is particularly good looking. However, if there is a good looking angle of the XM, it’s up front. Its grille, while large, is actually pretty good looking and its split headlights work well on the XM’s large face. Even the front air intakes are pretty subdued. Overall, the XM is far better looking up front than I had anticipated, given BMW’s recent history. At the same time, the Urus has a beak-like front end that’s just never really looked good. So, shockingly, the XM wins up front.
It might be because the Lamborghini Urus has been around so long that I’m used to it but its profile is starting to grow on me. It has a bit of a hunchback but there’s a sporty sharpness to it that’s looking better as it gets older. While the BMW XM is more traditionally shaped overall, there’s a frumpiness to it, especially around its C-pillar, which ruins it for me. It isn’t necessarily bad looking, it just looks a bit off, while the Urus looks a but more cohesive. So it wins here.
The rear end is the Urus’ best angle, I think. It has a sort of hot-hatch vibe which gives a sportier look. The…
